Skip to content

Fix minor Grant CRD reconciler service inconsistency - #35

Merged
ThoSap merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-minor-grant-crd-reconciler-service-inconsitency
Feb 26, 2026
Merged

Fix minor Grant CRD reconciler service inconsistency#35
ThoSap merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-minor-grant-crd-reconciler-service-inconsitency

Conversation

@ThoSap

@ThoSap ThoSap commented Feb 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This was missing for TABLE, for SEQUENCE, it was already like this.
image

@ThoSap ThoSap self-assigned this Feb 26, 2026
@ThoSap
ThoSap requested a review from alexlanz February 26, 2026 09:45

@alexlanz alexlanz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Am I missing something here? Aren't you basically replacing the same code just with a variable? The ´isAllModevariable is just referencingobjects.isEmpty()`.

@ThoSap

ThoSap commented Feb 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Yes, that is right.
This is just to stay consistent with the other switch case below for SEQUENCE.

@ThoSap
ThoSap merged commit 35ddaeb into main Feb 26, 2026
4 checks passed
@ThoSap
ThoSap deleted the fix-minor-grant-crd-reconciler-service-inconsitency branch February 26, 2026 14:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants